markmonitor.com
blog

MarkMonitor Customer Response to New TLDs

November 20, 2008 – 1:58 pm by Fred Felman

 

Before it was apparent that ICANN was pursuing new Top-Level Domains (TLDs) and the publication of the Draft Applicant Guidebook (DAG) which explains the program, we heard no interest whatsoever from our customers on this subject.

 

Since the publication of the DAG, our customers have voiced confusion & anger.  They find the methodology complicated, the expense high, and, most importantly, a potential for abuse that is even greater than in the existing namespace.  As for the opportunity that TLDs present, our customers — most large brand rights holders — are not interested in applying for new TLDs, but may feel forced to do so under the circumstances.  Many of them feel compelled to protect their existing rights – at extreme expense.  Only a small minority of our customers to date have embraced the idea for marketing or other reasons.

 

Universally, every customer we’ve spoken to has expressed concern over the immense scale of trademark abuse in the existing namespace as well as the insufficiency of the tools & great expense of resolving this abuse. Moreover, they worry about the tangible damage to Internet users from fraud and other crimes that are enabled by this abuse.   With the new TLDs, they see much more abuse coming unless ICANN adopts better protections against systemic brand abuse.

 

Many customers asked us to help them make these concerns known to ICANN.  As a result, we are preparing a comment on behalf of our customers that highlight these issues and advocates measures that should help to address them.   We hope that our contribution will result in a more balanced approach that minimizes the expenditures required by our customers to fight brand abuse in the new TLDs.

 

  1. One Response to “MarkMonitor Customer Response to New TLDs”

  2. As the situation stands, ICANN is not really interested in getting too involved in mechanics involved in fighting online fraudulent domain usage. They are quite content to let a registrar allow a registrant change one set of fake whois details with a next set, then yet another fake set. Meanwhile this same registrant is spoofing numerous banks with these fake details.

    Theorectically everything is addressed in a document called the ICANN RAA, a document that is an agreement as to how the registrar will address certian issues, but which is no more than window dressing. Trying to get that same agreement enforced is near impossible.

    So, lacking these abuse procedures, we are going to get even more of the same.

    If anything undermines the stability of and confidence in the internet, not only as a place for business, but in fact for anything, it is the lack of accountability and willingness by ICANN to enforce the RAA.

    Only recently the community exposed a registrar as having a CEO being involved in fraud. After public outcry, the registrar agreement was revoked.

    Right now another registrar is providing “privacy” to domain registrants using another provider. Yet this privacy provider does not exist at the claimed address since the address does not exist. See
    http://community.ca.com/blogs/securityadvisor/archive/2007/10/23/operation-greendot-following-the-spam.aspx

    Oh, what a slump the ICANN neighbourhood is becomming!

    By Ders on Dec 3, 2008

Post a Comment